California’s New Healthcare Minimum Wage



Big changes for CA healthcare workers! New minimum wage rates are in effect, with increases rolling out as of October 16, 2024. Weintraub attorneys Nikki Mahmoudi and Jacqueline Simonovich make sure you’re up to date with the change on the latest episode of California Employment News.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel.

Continue reading California’s New Healthcare Minimum Wage


Minimum Wage Increases for 2025



Another year is drawing closer, and with it comes another minimum wage increase for California. Nikki Mahmoudi and Tomiwa Aina review the expected minimum wage increases for 2025 in this episode of California Employment News.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel.

 

Continue reading Minimum Wage Increases for 2025


A Refresher on Voting Leave Laws for CA Employers



It is election season, and that means employees might need to take time off work to vote. Nikki Mahmoudi and Tomiwa Aina give a quick review of California’s voting leave law as it applies to businesses in this episode of California Employment News.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel.

 

Continue reading A Refresher on Voting Leave Laws for CA Employers


Key Rules for California Employers: Business Expense Reimbursement



Are you reimbursing employees for business expenses? Weintraub attorneys Meagan Bainbridge and Nikki Mahmoudi discuss key reimbursement policies under California law, including cell phone use and mileage for business travel in this episode of California Employment News.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel.

Continue reading Key Rules for California Employers: Business Expense Reimbursement


Understanding ADA/FEHA Requirements and the Interactive Process



Meagan Bainbridge and Ryan Abernethy break down reasonable accommodations under the ADA and FEHA. Learn what employers need to know about handling requests and engaging in the interactive process in this installment of California Employment News.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel.

Continue reading Understanding ADA/FEHA Requirements and the Interactive Process


Court Ruling Halts FTC’s Non-Compete Ban – Implications for Employers



A recent Texas federal court ruling has put a halt on the enforcement of the FTC’s ban on non-compete agreements. Learn more about this ruling and the implications it has for employers from Shauna Correia and Jacqueline Simonovich as they give an update from their previous episode in this installment of California Employment News.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel.

Continue reading Court Ruling Halts FTC’s Non-Compete Ban – Implications for Employers


Understanding the FTC Non-Compete Ban Key Insights for Employers



CEN Thumb - Non-CompeteThe FTC’s new rule banning non-compete clauses will take effect on September 4th and impact all workers, including contractors and interns. Weintraub attorneys Jacqueline Simonovich and Shauna Correia discuss the pending legal challenges and how the outcome could reach the Supreme Court in the latest installment of California Employment News.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel and listen to this podcast episode here.

Continue reading Understanding the FTC Non-Compete Ban Key Insights for Employers


Understanding the Basics of Employee Personnel Files (Featured)



CEN Blog ImageEmployee personnel files are an important aspect of any employer’s records. Meagan Bainbridge and Nikki Mahmoudi review the basics of employee personnel files, including what should and should not be included and handling inspection requests, in this featured episode of California Employment News.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel and listen to this podcast episode here.


 

Show Notes:

Meagan

Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us for this installment of “California Employment News”, an informative video and podcast resource offered by the labor and employment group at Weintraub Tobin. My name is Meagan Bainbridge, and I’m a shareholder in the firm’s labor and employment group. Today I’m joined by my colleague Nikki Mahmoudi, and we will be discussing personnel files and more importantly, what should and should not be included in an employee’s personnel file. Nikki, why don’t you start off with describing what labor codes section 1198.5 tells us about personnel files?

Nikki

Of course. So, the labor code section provides that current and former employees or a representative have the right to inspect and receive a copy of the personnel filing records relating to the employee’s performance or to any grievance concerning the employee. Now, the key here is it has to be a written request. So categories of records that are generally considered to be personnel records, they’re typically those that are used or have been used to determine an employee’s qualifications for promotion, additional compensation, disciplinary action, including termination. So some examples of these records include hiring records, payroll authorization forms, notices, accommodation warning, discipline, termination, notices of layoff, leave of absence and vacation, notices of wage attachment or garnishment, education and training notices and records, performance appraisals or reviews, and attendance records. Now, there’s some records that the right to inspect personnel records and files does not apply to. So these are records relating to the investigation of a possible criminal offense, letters of reference or ratings, reports or records that were one obtained prior to the employee’s employment, two were prepared by identifiable examination committee member or three obtained in connection with a promotional exam. Megan, are there any other tips that you have for the process of providing these records or copying these records?

Meagan

Thanks, Nikki. Well, the code provides that employers should maintain a copy of personnel records for a period of three years after termination. Per new legislation in 2022, employers should now maintain a copy of personnel records for a period of no less than four years from the date of termination of an employee or a nonhier of an applicant, and possibly even longer where employees or applicants have filed some sort of complaint alleging wrongdoing of some kind. If there is such a complaint, best practice would be to just maintain their personal record till the conclusion of that action. Employers should also remember that they must make their records available for inspections to both employees and former employees. These inspections must be allowed at a reasonable time and at a reasonable interview, but in most cases, no later than 30 calendar days from the date an employee makes the written request. Additionally, if requested by the employee or the employee’s representative, the inspection must be permitted at a place where the employee reports to work or at another location agreeable to the parties. Former employees, however, may inspect their records at the location where the employee stores those records, unless the parties agree to a different place in writing.

Copies of personnel records may also be provided by mail at the employee’s cost. Finally, while an employer is not required to make an employee’s personnel file available during the employee’s regular working hours, no loss of compensation to the employee should be permitted under any circumstances. Nikki, are there any limits to how often an employer has to comply with these kinds of requests?

Nikki

Yes, there are. So when it comes to former employees, an employer is required to comply with only one request per year. When it comes to representatives of the employees, an employer is not required to comply with more than 50 requests to inspect or receive a copy of personnel files filed by representative or representative employees in one calendar month. When it comes to current employees, we talk about how these inspections can happen within a reasonable interval, and typically that would be once every year. But there are some exceptions to this. Let’s say if there’s reasonable cause to believe that the file has been altered in a manner that might adversely affect the interest of the employee, or the file contains information pertinent to an ongoing investigation affecting the employee. One other thing to keep in mind is it is very important that employers comply with these requests. If an employer fails to either allow for the inspection or provide copies of these records with the times specified or times agreed to by mutual agreement, then employee or the labor commissioner may recover a penalty of $750 from the employer. Another thing that can happen is employees could also bring in action for injunctive relief to obtain compliance and potentially recover costs and reasonable attorney fees, which we want to avoid.

Meagan

Thanks, Nikki. And that does it for today. Thank you for joining us. You can continue to find the “California Employment News” on our blog at the www.lelawblog.com or wherever you listen to your favorite podcast. We’ll see you next time.


Navigating the New PAGA Reforms: What Employers Need to Know



CEN - PAGA

Weintraub attorneys Shauna Correia and Lukas Clary as they discuss the new PAGA reform, offering insights on how it impacts California employers and steps they can take to stay compliant in the latest episode of “California Employment News.” Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel and listen to this podcast episode here.

Continue reading Navigating the New PAGA Reforms: What Employers Need to Know


Is The FTC Recent Rule on Non-Competes a New Reality for Reality Stars



 Is The FTC Recent Rule on Non-Competes a New Reality for Reality Stars This week on “California Employment News,” Shauna Correia joins Entertainment attorney Scott Hervey on “The Briefing” to discuss the FTC’s recent final rule banning post-employment non-compete clauses and how it will affect non-scripted or reality television talent.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel here.

Continue reading Is The FTC Recent Rule on Non-Competes a New Reality for Reality Stars